Small bites versus large bites during fascial closure of midline laparotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Incisional ventral hernias (IVH) are common after laparotomies, with up to 20% incidence in 12 months, increasing up to 60% at 3-5 years. Although Small Bites (SB) is the standard technique for fascial closure in laparotomies, its adoption in the United States is limited, and Large Bites (LB) is still commonly performed. We aim to assess the effectiveness of SB regarding IVH. METHODS: We searched for RCTs and observational studies on Cochrane, EMBASE, and PubMed from inception to May 2023. We selected patients ≥ 18 years old, undergoing midline laparotomies, comparing SB and LB for IVH, surgical site infections (SSI), fascial dehiscence, hospital stay, and closure duration. We used RevMan 5.4. and RStudio for statistics. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics, and random effect was used if I2 > 25%. RESULTS: 1687 studies were screened, 45 reviewed, and 6 studies selected, including 3 RCTs and 3351 patients (49% received SB and 51% LB). SB showed fewer IVH (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.39-0.74; P < 0.001) and SSI (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.86; P = 0.002), shorter hospital stay (MD -1.36 days; 95% CI -2.35, -0.38; P = 0.007), and longer closure duration (MD 4.78 min; 95% CI 3.21-6.35; P < 0.001). No differences were seen regarding fascial dehiscence. CONCLUSION: SB technique has lower incidence of IVH at 1-year follow-up, less SSI, shorter hospital stay, and longer fascial closure duration when compared to the LB. SB should be the technique of choice during midline laparotomies.

Body Mass Index Effect on Minimally Invasive Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Obesity is one of the most important risk factors for complications after ventral hernia repair (VHR), and minimally invasive (MIS) techniques are preferred in obese patients as they minimize wound complications. It is common practice to attempt weight loss to achieve a specific body mass index (BMI) goal; however, patients are often unable to reach it and fail to become surgical candidates. Therefore, we aim to perform a meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes of obese and nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic VHR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify studies comparing obese and nonobese patients undergoing MIS VHR. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by means of pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. RESULTS: A total of 6483 studies were screened and 26 were thoroughly reviewed. Eleven studies and 3199 patients were included in the meta-analysis. BMI >40 kg/m 2 cutoff analysis included 5 studies and 1533 patients; no differences in hernia recurrence [odds ratios (OR): 1.64; 95% CI: 0.57-4.68; P = 0.36; I2 = 47%), seroma, hematoma, and surgical site infection (SSI) rates were noted. BMI >35 kg/m 2 cutoff analysis included 5 studies and 1403 patients; no differences in hernia recurrence (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.71-2.16; P = 0.58; I2 = 0%), seroma, hematoma, and SSI rates were noted. BMI >30 kg/m 2 cutoff analysis included 4 studies and 385 patients; no differences in hernia recurrence (OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 0.5-8.54; P = 0.32; I2 = 0%), seroma, hematoma, and SSI rates were noted. CONCLUSION: Patients with high BMI undergoing MIS VHR have similar hernia recurrence, seroma, hematoma, and SSI rates compared with patients with lower BMI. Further prospective studies with long-term follow-up and patient-reported outcomes are required to establish optimal management in obese patients undergoing VHR.

Mesh repair versus non-mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mesh repair in incarcerated or strangulated groin hernia is controversial, especially when bowel resection is required. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing mesh and non-mesh repair in patients undergoing emergency groin hernia repair. METHODS: We performed a literature search of databases to identify studies comparing mesh and primary suture repair of patients with incarcerated or strangulated inguinal or femoral hernias who underwent emergency surgery. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. RESULTS: 1095 studies were screened and 101 were thoroughly reviewed. Twenty observational studies and four randomized controlled trials comprising 12,402 patients were included. We found that mesh-based repair had reduced recurrence (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.19, 0.67; P = 0.001; I2 = 35%), length of hospital stay (OR - 1.02; 95% CI - 1.87, - 0.17; P = 0.02; I2 = 94%) and operative time (OR - 9.21; 95% CI - 16.82, - 1.61; P = 0.02; I2 = 95%) without increasing surgical site infection, mortality or postoperative complications such as seroma, chronic, ileus or urinary retention. In the subgroup analysis of patients that underwent bowel resection, we found that mesh repair was associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.04, 2.91; P = 0.04; I2 = 9%). CONCLUSIONS: Mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernias reduces recurrence without an increase in postoperative complications and should be considered in clean cases. However, in the setting of bowel resection, mesh repair might increase the incidence of surgical site infection.

Heavyweight versus non-heavyweight mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: There is considerable variability among surgeons regarding the type of mesh used in ventral hernia repair. There has been an increasing incidence of mesh fractures with lightweight (LW) and mediumweight (MW) meshes. However, HW mesh has been associated with a greater foreign body sensation and chronic pain. This meta-analysis aims to compare the outcomes of HW and non-heavyweight (NHW) meshes in ventral hernia repair. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases to identify studies comparing HW with NHW meshes in hernia repair. Outcomes analyzed included hernia recurrence, seroma, hematoma, foreign body sensation, postoperative pain, and wound infection. We performed two subgroup analyses focusing on randomized controlled trials and open retromuscular repairs. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. RESULTS: We screened 1704 studies. Nine studies were finally included in this meta-analysis and comprised 3001 patients from 4 RCTs and 5 non-randomized. The majority of patients (57.1%) underwent open retromuscular repair. HW mesh was significantly associated with increased in foreign body sensation (OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.40-9.84; p = 0.008), but there was no difference in other outcomes. In RCTs analysis, there was no difference between meshes. In open retromuscular repairs, HW mesh was associated with more seromas (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.01-2.17; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study found that HW mesh was associated with more foreign body sensation. Also, open retromuscular repairs analysis showed that HW was associated with more seromas. Further randomized studies are needed to understand better the role of HW mesh in ventral hernia repair.

Keyhole Versus Sugarbaker Mesh Configuration in Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia repairs (PHRs) are often complex and challenging, even for experienced abdominal wall surgeons. Although the ideal therapeutic option in the setting of a parastomal hernia is to restore intestinal continuity, this is often not feasible, and numerous techniques have been described for PHR. Current guidelines recommend using mesh for elective PHR, but there is a scarcity of evidence comparing different PHR techniques. We aimed to report a meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of the "Sugarbaker" and "Keyhole" mesh configuration in PHR. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify studies comparing Sugarbaker and Keyhole mesh configuration in PHR. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by means of pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. RESULTS: A total of 3247 studies were screened, and 27 were fully reviewed. Ten studies and 632 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Three hundred five patients (48.3%) with Keyhole and 327 patients (51.7%) with Sugarbaker mesh configuration. Four hundred thirty-three patients (68.5%) underwent laparoscopic PHR with intraperitoneal onlay mesh. Sugarbaker mesh configuration was associated with lower hernia recurrence compared with Keyhole (odds ratio: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.19-0.83; P = 0.01; I2 = 46%). No differences were seen in overall complications, reoperations, stoma outlet obstruction, mesh infection, and postoperative bleeding. CONCLUSION: PHR with Sugarbaker mesh configuration is associated with decreased hernia recurrence compared with Keyhole and had similar rates of overall complications, reoperations, stoma outlet obstruction, mesh infection, and postoperative bleeding.

Extensive Heterotopic Ossification in a Large Incisional Ventral Hernia After a Burn Injury Requiring Transversus Abdominis Release.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is an atypical complication of burn injuries presenting in 0.2-4% of cases. Usually, HO develops surrounding long bones or joints after orthopedic procedures or trauma. However, on extremely rare occasions, HO can develop from other bones such as the xiphoid. The purpose of this case report is to describe a case of an open retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction with bilateral transversus abdominis release (TAR) in a patient with extensive abdominal heterotopic ossification following a midline laparotomy in the setting of a large burn injury. The patient was a 42-year-old man with a history of 55% total burn surface area (TBSA) second- and third-degree flame burns who was treated in a large academic hospital with a renowned burn unit. His case in particular was brought to attention for the rare presentation of the aftermath of a burn injury and the technical surgical challenge it posed. Five months after the last surgical intervention, the patient is doing well without further complications or clinical signs of hernia recurrence. Since there are no established guidelines for patients with HO after burn injuries, learning about alternate strategies will expand the armamentarium of abdominal wall reconstruction surgeons in this challenging patient population. Specifically, retromuscular ventral hernia repair with transversus abdominis release and synthetic mesh can be used in complex ventral hernia repair complicated by heterotopic ossification after a major burn.

Preoperative Optimization Before Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of ventral hernia development and recurrence rates after ventral hernia repair (VHR). The metabolic derangements caused by obesity can also lead to many postoperative complications. Therefore, it is a common practice to attempt weight loss before VHR. However, there is still no consensus on optimal preoperative management for obese patients with a ventral hernia. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of preoperative weight optimization on VHR outcomes. METHODS: We performed a literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies comparing obese patients who underwent surgical or non-surgical weight loss interventions before undergoing hernia repair surgery to obese patients who underwent hernia repair surgery without prehabilitation. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by means of pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 statistics. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred nine studies were screened and 13 were thoroughly reviewed. Five studies comprising 465 patients undergoing hernia repair surgery were included. No differences in hernia recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.66; 95% CI 0.23-1.89; P =0.44; I 2 =20%], seroma (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.25-1.95; P =0.50; I 2 =5%), hematoma (OR 2.00; 95% CI 0.5-7.94; P =0.45; I 2 =0%), surgical site infection (OR 1.96; 95% CI 0.52-7.40; P =0.32; I 2 =0%), and overall complication (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.37-1.74; P =0.58; I 2 =40%) rates were noted when comparing patients who underwent a preoperative weight loss intervention (prehabilitation or bariatric surgery) versus those who did not. In the subgroup analysis of patients who underwent bariatric surgery, we found no difference in hernia recurrence (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.12-3.33; P = 0.59; I 2 =41%) or overall complications (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.36-3.64; P =0.82; I 2 =64%). In the subgroup analysis of patients who lost weight versus patients who did not, there was no significant difference in overall complication rates (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.34-2.21; P =0.76; I 2 =55%). CONCLUSIONS: We found similar hernia recurrence, seroma, hematoma, and surgical site infection rates in patients who underwent preoperative optimization. These findings underline the need for prospective studies to define the optimal role of preoperative optimization and weight loss in obese patients undergoing ventral hernia repair.

Biologic versus synthetic mesh in open ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed worldwide, and using mesh is standard of care to decrease recurrence. Biologic meshes are increasingly used to minimize complications associated with synthetic mesh, but with significantly higher cost and unclear efficacy. Until recently, most of the evidence supporting the use of biologic meshes was from retrospective cohorts with high heterogeneity and risk of bias. We aimed to report a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of synthetic and biologic mesh in elective open ventral hernia repair. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials comparing biologic and synthetic mesh in elective open ventral hernia repairs. The postoperative outcomes were assessed by means of pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1,090 studies were screened, and 22 were fully reviewed. Four randomized controlled trials and 632 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Fifty-eight percent of patients had contaminated wounds (Wound Classification II-IV). Hernia recurrence (odds ratio 2.75; 95% confidence interval 1.76-4.31; P < .00001; I2 = 0%) and surgical site infections (odds ratio 1.53; 95% confidence interval 1.02-2.29; P = .04; I2 = 0%) were significantly more common in patients with biologic mesh. The rates of seroma, hematoma, and mesh removal were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: As compared to synthetic mesh, biologic meshes resulted in increased hernia recurrences and surgical site infections. Current evidence supports macroporous, uncoated synthetic mesh as the implant of choice for elective open ventral hernia repair, and its use should be considered even in contaminated cases.

Pitfalls and complications of enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal approach to abdominal wall reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal access technique (eTEP) to minimally invasive retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction is a relatively novel technique that has continued to gain popularity. There is a paucity of information regarding the prevention and management of eTEP complications. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the complications reported with eTEP ventral hernia repair and discuss the main complications associated with this technique. METHODS: A literature search via PubMed was performed focusing on eTEP ventral hernia repair. Based on the available literature and own practice experience, the authors discuss key strategies for preventing and managing complications associated with the eTEP approach. RESULTS: One hundred fifty studies were identified. Forty-seven studies were fully reviewed and twenty-four were included in this review. The technical details of the technique were described as performed by the authors. Postoperative complications were classified into different categories and discussed separately. CONCLUSION: As the eTEP approach continues to gain popularity, it is essential to consider its unique complications. A focus on prevention with anatomical bearings and sound surgical technique is paramount.

Pancreatic pseudocyst extending into psoas muscle mimicking acute complicated diverticulitis: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) are known sequelae of pancreatitis. In this case, we present a patient with a pancreatic pseudocyst extending to the left psoas muscle, initially masquerading as acute complicated diverticulitis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old male with previous episode of pancreatitis presented with a one-week history of abdominal pain. Physical examination revealed left lower quadrant tenderness. A computed tomography (CT) showed a large intraperitoneal fluid collection extending to the left psoas muscle with segmental inflammation of the descending colon. The patient was managed medically with empiric antibiotic therapy for concern of complicated diverticulitis. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage was performed and fluid analysis showed lipase >20,000 U/L. The patient was discharged home with the drain. At one month follow up a repeat CT showed resolution of the left psoas fluid collection. The drain was removed and the patient remained asymptomatic at two month follow-up. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Pancreatic pseudocysts are well-known complications of pancreatitis. In this case, we describe extension of a pseudocyst to the left psoas muscle. We identified twelve previously reported patients diagnosed with PP involving the psoas muscles. Our case is unique as there is no previously published case in which a pseudocyst masqueraded as complicated diverticulitis. In analysis of the literature, most patients were managed with percutaneous drainage. Only 50% had documented complete resolution on follow up; of those 75% had undergone percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic pseudocysts that extend to the psoas muscle can mimic acute complicated diverticulitis upon presentation. These may be effectively managed with percutaneous drainage.